Psychosocial risk factors in women with double presence in times of Covid 19
Keywords:
doble presencia, riesgo psicosocial, Covid 19, carga laboral, confinamientoAbstract
Justification: due to the increase in psychosocial risk factors derived from health contingency measures, such as confinement that led to the performance of various tasks in a single space, with women being the most vulnerable population against aspects such as work overload. Objective: To identify which are the psychosocial risk factors in women with double presence in times of pandemic. Ethical aspects: this research is carried out under the framework of informed consent, making clear the academic objective of the study, data collection method, and duties and rights of the participant. Methodology: descriptive design of a qualitative order with a phenomenological approach, based on a semi-structured interview with a 51-year-old woman with double presence. Results: Each of the psychosocial risk factors was evidenced: Work content, work hours, workload, family and work relationship and double presence. Conclusions: The results obtained denote the enormous inequality gap that prevails at home and at work, and that revolves around a series of social stereotypes.
Downloads
References
Cetron, M. (2005). Public health and ethical considerations in planning for quarantine. Yale J Biol Med. 2005; 78:325-30.
Cox, T. y Griffiths, A. (1996). The assessment of psychosocial hazards at work. In M.J. Schabracq, J. A. M. Winnubst, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. (pp. 127-146). Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
Forbes, R. (2011). El síndrome de burnout: síntomas, causas y medidas de atención en la empresa. Éxito empresarial, 160, 1. https://www.cegesti.org/exitoempresarial/publicaciones/publicacion_160_160811_es.pdf
French, J. R. P., Karasek, R., Siegrist, J. (citados por Díaz, 2011). Estrés laboral y sus factores de riesgo psicosocial. Rev CES Salud Pública. 2(1): 80-84
Ministerio de Salud. (2020). CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19). Nuevo coronavirus Covid-19. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/publica/PET/Paginas/Covid-19_copia.aspx
Moreno, B. Báez, C. (2010). Factores y riesgos psicosociales, formas, consecuencias, medidas y buenas prácticas. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Organización Internacional del Trabajo. (1984, septiembre). Factores psicosociales en el trabajo: naturaleza, incidencia y prevención (N.o 56). Serie seguridad, higiene y medicina del trabajo. http://www.factorespsicosociales.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FPS-OIT-OMS.pdf
Organización Internacional del Trabajo. (2018). Care works and care jobs for the future of decent work (CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland). ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data, pág. 43 https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_633135.pdf
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2010, 24 febrero). OMS ¿Qué es una pandemia? World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/es/
Resolución 2646 de 2008 Factores de riesgo psicosocial en el trabajo y determinación del origen de las patologías causadas por el estrés ocupacional. (2008, julio). Departamento Administrativo del Servicio Civil Distrital. https://www.serviciocivil.gov.co/portal/transparencia/marco-legal/normatividad/resoluci%C3%B3n-2646-de-2008-factores-de-riesgo-psicosocial
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daniela Patricia Alfonso Gámez, Alejandra Aguilar Calderón, Jeimy Stefany Rozo Gómez, Esmeralda Martínez Carrillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Portal de Ciencia Abierta