The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus

Authors

  • Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez Universidad Antonio Nariño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825

Keywords:

History of science, Differential calculus, Integral calculus

Abstract

Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meli, D. B. (1996). Equivalence and Priority:Newton Versus Leibniz: Including Leibniz’s Unpublished Manuscripts on the Principia.Oxford University Press.

Newton, I. (1833). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica(Vol.1).G.Brookman.

Published

2024-01-18
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    784
  • PDF (Español)
    218

How to Cite

Méndez Pérez, M. Ángel. (2024). The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus. REVISTA SAYWA, 5(6), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825

Issue

Section

Matemáticas

Metrics