The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825Keywords:
History of science, Differential calculus, Integral calculusAbstract
Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death.
Downloads
References
Meli, D. B. (1996). Equivalence and Priority:Newton Versus Leibniz: Including Leibniz’s Unpublished Manuscripts on the Principia.Oxford University Press.
Newton, I. (1833). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica(Vol.1).G.Brookman.
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract784
-
PDF (Español)218
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.