Epistemological Beliefs of Mathematics Teachers about Mathematics, its Teaching and its Relationship to Teaching Practice

Authors

  • Grace Judith Vesga Bravo Universidad Antonio Nariño
  • Mary Falk de Losada Universidad Antonio Nariño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v8n16.449

Keywords:

epistemological beliefs, history of mathematics, fallibilism., absolutism, constructivism, traditionalism

Abstract

This research paper presents the result of a research process whose objective was to analyze and describe the epistemological beliefs that athematics teachers have about mathematics, its teaching and their relation with their actual teaching practice. The case study methodology was used involving three teachers, each one of them with over ten years of experience, who conducted a short course about a historical tour of quadratic equations, which was aimed to challenge the epistemological beliefs of the participants and to promote reflections on the matter. In order to collect the information closed questionnaires were applied, semi-structured interviews were conductedand teachers presented a proposal for teaching quadratic equations incorporating the aspects studied in the course. The results evidenced that teachers have endeavored to build a coherent epistemology between mathematics and its teaching and learning, but difficulties do persist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Artz, A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1999). “A cognitive model for examining teachers’ instructional practice in mathematics: A guide for facilitating teacher reflection”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 211–235.

(2) Buehl, M. & Fives, H. (2009). “Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching Knowledge: Where Does It Come From? Does It Change?”. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 367-408, DOI: 10.3200/JEXE.77.4.367-408.

(3) Charalambous, C., Panaoura,A., & Philippou, G. (2009). “Using the history of mathematics to induce changes in preservice teachers’ beliefs and attitudes: insights from evaluating a teacher education program”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 161–180. DOI: 10.1007/ s10649-008-9170-0.

(4) Chassapis, D. (2007). “Integrating the philosophy of mathematics in teacher training courses”. Philosophical Dimensions in Mathematics Education, 61-79. Springer US.

(5) Cooney, T., Shealy, B. & Arvold, B. (1998). “Conceptualizing belief structures of preservice secondary mathematics teachers”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 306-333.

(6) Cross, D. (2009). “Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices”. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 325–346. DOI 10.1007/ s10857-009-9120-5.

(7) Cross, D. (2015). “Dispelling the notion of inconsistencies in teachers’ mathematics beliefs and practices: A 3-year case study”. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 173–201. DOI 10.1007/s10857-014-9276-5.

(8) Davis, P., Hersh, R. & Marchisotto, E. (2012). The Mathematical Experience. Boston: Birkhäuser.

(9) Ernest, P. (1991). Philosophy of mathematics education. New York: Falmer

(10) Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

(11) Flores, P. (1995). Concepciones y creencias de los futuros profesores sobre las matemáticas, su enseñanza y aprendizaje. Evolución durante las prácticas de enseñanza (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Granana, Granada.

(12) Handal, B. & Herrington, A. (2003). “Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform”. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59-69.

(13) Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics really? New York: Oxford University Press.

(14) ICFES (2010). Resultados de Colombia en TIMSS 2007. Resumen ejecutivo. Bogotá: ICFES.

(15) ICFES (2013). Colombia en pisa 2012. Informe nacional de resultados. Resumen ejecutivo. ICFES. Bogotá: ICFES.

(16) Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.

(17) Lerman, S. (1990). “Alternative perspective of the nature of mathematics”. British Educational Research Journal, 16, 53–61.

(18) Ministerio de Educación Nacional (2006). Estándares básicos de competencias. Bogotá: Magisterio.

(19) Pajares, M. F. (1992). “Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct”. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-333.

(20) Pantziara, M., Karamanou, M., & Philippou, G. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and knowledge related to the cyprus mathematics curriculum reform. En F. Arzarello (Presidencia), Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8). En Manavgat-Side, Antalya – Turkey.

(21) Penn, A. (2012). The Alignment of Preservice Elementary School Teachers’ Beliefs concerning Mathematics and Mathematics Teaching (Tesis de maestría). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

(22) Pepin, B. (1999). Epistemologies, beliefs and conceptions of mathematics teaching and learning: The theory, and what is manifested in mathematics teachers’ work in England, France and Germany. TNTEE Publications, 2(1), 127-146.

(23) Phillipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers‘ beliefs and affects. En F. Lester (Ed.). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing y NCTM.

(24) Raymond, A. (1997). “Inconsistencies between a beginning elementary teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576.

(25) Sampieri, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. Sexta edición. México: Mac Graw Hill.

(26) Skott, J. (2009). “Contextualising the notion of ‘belief enactment’”. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,12(1), 27–46.

(27) Steiner, H. (1987). “Philosophical and epistemological aspects of mathematics and their interaction with theory and practice in mathematics education”. Learning of Mathematics 7(1), 7-13.

(28) Steup, M. (2014). “Epistemology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy” [En línea], disponible en http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/epistemology/>, Recupera do el 4 de noviembre de 2014.

(29) Stipek, D., Givvin, K., Salmon, J. & MacGyvers, V. (2001). “Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17 (2), 213 – 226.

(30) Sztajn, P. (2003). “Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics”. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53–75.

(31) Thompson, A. (1984). “The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics teaching to instructional practice”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 105–127.

(32) Thompson, A. (1992). “Teacher’s beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research”. Grouws, D.A., (Ed.), Handbook on mathematics teaching and learning, 127-146. New York: Macmillan.

(33) Walker. D. (2007). The development and construct validation of epistemological beliefs survey for mathemathics, (Tesis doctoral). Oklahoma State University, E.U.A.

(34) White-Fredette, K. (2009). What is Mathematics? An Exploration of Teachers’ Philosophies of Mathematics during a Time of Curriculum Reform.

(35) White-Fredette, K. (2009/2010). “Why Not Philosophy? Problematizing the Philosophy of Mathematics in a Time of Curriculum Reform”. The Mathematics Educator,19(2), pp. 21-31.

(36) Yang, X. (2014). Conception and Characteristics of Expert Mathematics Teachers in China. Berlin: Springer.

Published

2017-09-13
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    262
  • PDF (Español)
    216

How to Cite

Vesga Bravo, G. J., & Falk de Losada, M. . (2017). Epistemological Beliefs of Mathematics Teachers about Mathematics, its Teaching and its Relationship to Teaching Practice. Papeles, 8(16), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v8n16.449

Issue

Section

Artículos de Investigación

Metrics