A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity

Authors

  • Francisco Alexánder Llerena Avendaño
  • Angélica del Pilar Nieves Gil
  • Carlos Eduardo Sepúlveda Medina
  • Edwin Armando Guzmán Urrego

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v9n18.495

Keywords:

legacy, teacher-artist, performing arts, tradition, contemporaneity, cultural construction

Abstract

The configuration of a bachelor’s program in performing arts (previously a bachelor’s degree in arts education with an emphasis on dance and theater) promotes the construction
of a field of study that is recent in our country. In that sense, building a
legacy implies recognizing our own face in the mirror of history. Although German historiography - so important in the nineteenth century - stopped at the historical as a narrative of great stories and heroics, in the XX and XXI centuries the Annales School will investigate the fleeting, the transitory and the allowance. History is constituted by those intimate and fragmentary stories that help to consolidate the destiny
of nations. Thus, our story starts with building a memory that allows us to leave sensitive evidence of the construction of a field that is vanishing nowadays: tradition. The
crisis of representation, the anguish of images, the passion aroused by networks, the virtuality and the desire for permanent technological innovation, seem to leave out
the constitution of the historical personality, for that reason our program promotes a controversial field between tradition and contemporaneity. The tradition, thought from a wide perspective, is not conceived as everything that remains static and probably cornered and closed in the walls of the museum. Tradition was not a becoming;
it remains being as a cultural construction that defines us as humans although the speed of our present time insists on subjugate us. What we are today comes from far
away, in the Hegelian sense of recognizing the historical trajectory as the unfolding of the spirit. Our traditions are legacies that remain alive and that continue up to
be built in an open look to the future. Therefore, we insist on our program to leave evidences of a memory that we have built for thirty years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(1) Artística, L. e. (18 de noviembre de 2017). Documento de Registro Calificado. Documento Maestro. Bogotá, Colombia: UAN.

(2) Bourdieu, P. (2016). La distinción: criterio y bases sociales del gusto. Taurus

(3) Bürger, P. (1988). O declínio da era moderna. Revista Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 20, 81-95.ISO 690

(4) Deleuze, G., Delpy, M. S., & Beccacece, H. (2002). Diferencia y repetición. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

(5) Descartes, R. (2004). Discurso del método (Vol. 39). M. Caimi (Ed.). Ediciones Colihue SRL.

(6) Dewey, J. (1929). El hábito y el impulso en la conducta. Ediciones de la Lectura.

(7) Dewey, J. (1995). Democracia y educación: una introducción a la filosofía de la educación. Ediciones Morata.

(8) Einstein, A. (2016). Sobre la teoría de la relatividad. Albert Einstein.

(9) Foucault, M. (2010). La ética del cuidado de sí como práctica de la libertad. Nombres: Revista de Filosofía.

(10) Gardner, H. (2016). Estructuras de la mente: la teoría de las inteligencias múltiples. Fondo de cultura económica.

(11) Gergen, K. (2005). La comunicación terapéutica como relación. Sistemas Familiares, 21(1-2), 119-135.

(12) Goleman, D. (1999). La práctica de la inteligencia emocional. Editorial Kairós. Habermas, J. (2008). El discurso filosófico de la modernidad (Vol. 3035). Katz Editores.

(13) Heisenberg, A. Werner Heisenberg y Moe Berg, dos vidas cruzadas por la incertidumbre.

(14) Kant, I. (2009). Crítica de la razón pura. Ediciones Colihue SRL.

(15) Lyotard, J. F. (1993). La condición postmoderna: informe sobre el saber. Planeta-Agostini.

(16) Morin, D. R. L. (2015). La construcción del conocimiento: algunas reflexiones. Límite Revista Interdisciplinaria de Filosofía y Psicología, 5(21), 59-75.

(17) Platón, D. (2003). Obra completa (9 vol.). Madrid, Editorial Gredos. Proyecto Educativo Institucional – PEI. Universidad Antonio Nariño

(18) Santos, B. D. S. (2007). La Universidad en el siglo XXI: para una reforma democrática y emancipatoria de la universidad.

Published

2017-04-12
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    402
  • PDF (Español)
    361

How to Cite

Llerena Avendaño, F. A., Nieves Gil, A. del P., Sepúlveda Medina, C. E., & Guzmán Urrego, E. A. (2017). A legacy still alive: between tradition and contemporaneity. Papeles, 9(18), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v9n18.495

Issue

Section

Artículos de Investigación

Metrics