Study of Metacognitive Awareness in Colombian University Teachers

Authors

  • Andrea Barrera-Bernal Universidad Antonio Nariño
  • José Bayona-Umbarila Universidad Antonio Nariño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v12n23.642

Keywords:

metacognition, MAIT, University Teachers, regulation, correlation

Abstract

A study was conducted about metacognitive skills reported by 118 university teachers in Bogotá through a metacognitive awareness inventory for teachers (MAIT). Based on the data collected, a validation of the instrument and the analysis of the correlation between some characterization variables of the teachers and the MAIT subcategories are carried out, as well as correlations between the own subcategories. In the analysis of the correlation of the sample is not evident that the variables of age, experience or studies have influence on the results reported by the teachers in the MAIT. In the analysis between the subcategories, the declarative knowledge and the ability to planning are the subcategories that most relate to others because their fundamental nature. On the other hand, a procedural knowledge and monitoring and evaluation skill seems to have little correlation with other subcategories because they tend to more practical processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, J. M., Carr, M. y Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental review, 15(1), 1-37.

Bayona-Umbarila. J. (2017). Incidencia del uso de matrices evaluativas, en la alineación entre sus calificaciones auto, co y hetero-evaluativas y en los cambios de su conocimiento sobre la utilidad de estos tipos de evaluación. (Trabajo de grado Maestría en Evaluación y Calidad). Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Campo, K., Escorcia, D., Moreno, M. y Palacio, J. (2016). Metacognición, escritura y rendimiento académico en universitarios de Colombia y Francia. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 34(2), 233-252.

Castañeda, M. B. (2010). Procesamiento de datos y análisis estadísticos utilizando SPSS: un libro práctico para investigadores y administradores educativos. EDIPUCRS.

Castellá, J. M. (2007). Entenderse en clase; estrategias discursivas y habilidades comunicativas. España: Graó.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring- A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psichology, 34, 906-911.

Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving: The Nature of Intelligence. Hillsdale: N. J. Erlbaum.

Gutiérrez de Blume, A. P., Wells, P., Davis, C. A. y Parker, J. (2017). “You Can Sort of Feel It”: Exploring Metacognition and the Feeling of Knowing Among Undergraduate Students. The Qualitative Report, 22(7).

Huertas Bustos, A. P., Vesga Bravo, G. J. y Galindo León, M. (2014). Validación del instrumento “Inventario de habilidades metacognitivas (MAI)” con estudiantes colombianos. Praxis & Saber, 5(10), 56-74.

Inhelder, B. y Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence: An essay on the construction of formal operational structures. Psychology Press, (22).

Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying Metacognition, Self-Regulation, and Self-Regulated Learning: What's the Purpose? Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 477-484.

Lukas, J. F. (1998). Análisis de items y de tests con ITEMAN. Leioa, España: Universidad del País Vasco.

Medel, G. A., Vilanova, S. L., Biggio, C., García, M. B. y Martín, S. S. (2017). Estrategias metacognitivas y concepciones sobre el aprendizaje en la formación inicial de profesores universitarios del área de ciencias exactas y naturales. Informes Psicológicos, 17(1), 35–51.

Mitchell, R. K., Busenitz, L., Lant, T., McDougall, P. P., Morse, E. A. y Smith, J. B. (2002). Toward a theory of entrepreneurial cognition: Rethinking the people side of entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27(2), 93-104.

Muria Vila, I. (1994). La enseñanza de las estrategias de aprendizaje y las habilidades metacognitivas. Perfiles educativos, (65).

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International journal of educational research, 31(6), 459-470.

Rodríguez, M. E. (1995). “Hablar” en la escuela: ¿Para qué? ... ¿Cómo? Lectura y Vida. Revista Latinoamericana de Lectura, 16(3), 31-40.

Saenz, G. D., Geraci, L., Miller, T. M. y Tirso, R. (2017). Metacognition in the classroom: The association between students’ exam predictions and their desired grades. Consciousness and cognition, (51), 125-139.

Santos, R. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of extension, 37(2), 1-5.

Schraw, G. y Dennison, R.S. (1994). Evaluación de la conciencia metacognitiva. Psicología educativa contemporánea, 19(4), 460-475.

Winne, P. H. y Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, M. Zeidner y P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). San Diego, EU.: Academic.

Zapata, N. A., Diaz, M. A. A., Diaz, H. H. A., González, R. y Fuentes, A. R. (2019). Estrategias metacognitivas y comprensión lectora en estudiantes universitarios. Apuntes Universitarios, 9(1), 36-45.

Published

2020-06-15
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    534
  • PDF (Español (España))
    565

How to Cite

Barrera-Bernal, A., & Bayona-Umbarila, J. (2020). Study of Metacognitive Awareness in Colombian University Teachers. Papeles, 12(23), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v12n23.642

Issue

Section

Artículos de Investigación

Metrics