Gentrificación y la nueva economía urbana en Barrio Logan
el Chicano Park como espacio público, resistencia cultural y contestación política
Palabras clave:
Gentrificación, espacio público, arte, cultura, economía urbanaResumen
Artículo que utiliza una etnografía de localidadmúltiple con el fin de analizar la dinámica de una organización sin fines de lucro y el lugar de ejecución del proyecto cultural en Barrio Logan, San Diego, California. Desde los conceptos de arte y espacio público que guían las políticas culturales, el estudio redefine al barrio y su emblema identitario como espacios de resistencia cultural y contestación política revelando una lógica sui géneris en comparación
con la formación de otros espacios públicos. Los objetivos del proyecto cultural de la organización serán analizados a la luz de esta redefinición con el fin de evaluar el proyecto.
Descargas
Citas
Arendt, H. (1970) On Violence. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace and Company.
Armstrong, J. (2005) The contested gallery: Street art, ethnography and the search of urban understanding. Ameriquest, 2 (1).
Baltes, B., Dickson M., Sherman M., Bauer C. & J. LaGanke (2002) Computermediatedcommunication and groups decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 87: 156-179.
Banerjee, T.(2001) The future of public space. Beyond the invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of American Planning Association, 67: 8-24.
Blandy, D. & K. Congdon (1988) Community based aesthetics as exhibition catalyst and foundation for community involvement in art education. Studies in Art Education, A journal
of Issues and Research, 29: 243-249.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. (1995) Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating narrative inquiry. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8: 25-35.
Boog, B. (2003) The emancipator character of action research, its history and the present state of the art. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13: 426-438.
Burton, L. & L. Robin (Nov. 2000) In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1114-1135.
Cameron, S. & J. Coaffee (2005) Art, gentrification and regeneration: From artist as pioneer to public arts. European Journal of Housing Policy, 5, 39–58.
Caughey, J. (1982) The ethnography of everyday life: Theories and methods for American culture studies. American Quarterly, 34: 222-243.
Chapin, T. (2002) Beyond the entrepreneurial city: Municipal capitalism in San Diego. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24: 565-581.
Dachler, P. & B. Wilpert (1978) Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 1-39.
Darlow, A. (1996) Cultural policy and urban sustainability: Making a missing link? Planning Practice and Research, 11: 291- 301.
Deutsche, R. (1992) Art and public space: Questions of democracy. Social Text, 34-53.
Durlauf, S. (2003) Neighborhood effects. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4.
Eggers, W. & J. O’Leary (1995) Broken window syndrome. Policy Review, 4.
Ewick, P. & S. Silbey (1995) Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law and Society Review, 29: 197-226.
Faber, D. & D. McCarthy (2002) The evolving structure of the environment justice movement in the United States: New models for democratic decision-making. Social Justice Research, 14: 4.
Fisher, W. (1984) Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs and Speech Monographs, 51: 1-22.
Ford, L. & E. Griffin (1979) The ghettoization of paradise. Geographical Review, 69: 140-158.
Fuller, B. (2003) Education policy under cultural pluralism. Educational Researcher, 32: 15-24.
Gould, I. & M. Austin (1997) Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8: 833-866.
Hall, T. & I. Robertson (2001) Public art and urban regeneration: Advocacy, claims and critical debates. Landscape Research, 26: 5–26
Hannerz, U. (2003). Being there… and there… and there! Reflections on multi-sited ethnography. Ethnografeast, 4: 201- 216.
Hein, H. (1996) What is public art? Time, place, and meaning. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 54: 1-7.
Hood, E. (2003). Dwelling disparities. How poor housing leads to poor health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113: 310-317.
Hogget, P. & C. Miller (2000) Working with emotions in community organizations. Community Development Journal, 34: 352-364.
Jackson, M., & F. Kabwasa-Green (2007) Space development: making the case. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/publications/1001176. html on March 22, 2008.
Jiménez, P. (2005) Segregation an environmental racism in San Diego. Retrieved on April 24, 2008 from http://www. calcultures.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view =37&Itemid=74
Kasinitz, P. (1992) Bringing the neighborhood back in: The new urban ethnography. Sociological Forum, 7: 355-363.
Kay, A. (2000) Art and community development: The role the arts have in regenerating communities. Community Development Journal, 34: 414-424.
Krizek, B. (1992). Goodbye old friend: A son’s farewell to Comiskey Park. Omega, 25 (2): 87-93
Lorie, E., Whyte, A., & K. Buckner (2001) An ethnography of a neighborhood café: Informality, table arrangements and background noise. Journal of Mundane Behavior, 2: 197-232.
Lloyd, R. (2002) Neo-Bohemia: Art and neighborhood redevelopment in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 5(24): 517-532.
Lowe, S. (2000) Creating community art for community development. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29: 357- 387.
Lufos, R, & D. Cahn, (2000) Conflict. From Theory to Action. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Marche, T. (1988) Looking outward, looking in: Community in art education. Art Education, 51: 6-13.
Marcus, G. (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 95-117.
Meek, L. (1988) Organizational culture: Origins and weaknesses. Organization Studies, 9: 453-473.
Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85: 108-133.
Mitchell, W. (2000) The violence of public art: “Do the right thing.” Critical inquiry, 16: 880-899.
Mohr, J., & R. Spekman (1994) Characteristic of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communications behavior, and conflict resolutions techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 135-152.
Montgomery, J. (1995) The story of Temple Bar: Creating Dublin’ s cultural quarter. Planning Practice and Research, 10: 135-172.
Montgomery, J. (1995) Urban vitality and the culture of cities.’ Planning Practice and Research, 10: 101-110.
Paz, O. (1959) El Laberinto de la Soledad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Pentland, B. (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. The Academy of Management Review, 24: 711-724.
Phillips, P. (1989) Temporality of public art. Art Journal. 331-335.
Pinder, D. (2005) Art of urban exploration. Cultural geographies, 12: 383-411.
Pondy, L. (1967) Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12: 296-320.
Punter, J. (2002) Urban design as public policy: Evaluating the design dimension of Vancouver’s planning system. International Planning Studies, 7: 265–282.
Remesar Ed. Urban regeneration: A challenge for public art. Monografies Psico-Socio-Ambientals. Títols publicats.
Roberts, M. & C. Marsh (1995) For art’ s sake: Public art, planning policies and the benefits for commercial property. Planning Practice and Research, 10: 189-198.
Rodriguez, J. (1998) Local history, public art, and community in an urbanizing suburb. Ecumene, 2: 218-236.
Rosen, M. (1991) Coming t terms with the field: Understanding 34 Gentrificación y la nueva economía el Chicano Park como espacio público, resistencia cultural y contestación política
and ding organizational ethnography. Journal of Management Studies, 28: 1-24.
Sanjek, R. (2000) Keeping ethnography alive in an urbanizing world. Human Organization, 59: 280-288.
Savage, M. (1988) Can ethnographic narrative be a neighborly act? Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 19: 3-19.
Schein, E. (1996) Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 229-240.
Sharp, J., Pollock V. & R. Paddison (2005) Just art for a just city: Public art social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42: 1001–1023.
Stevenson, W., Perace, J. & L. Porter (1985) The concept of coalition in organization theory and research. The Academy of Management Review, 10: 256-268.
Trunage, A. (2007) Email flaming behaviors and organizational conflict. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13: 43-59.
Van Maanen, J. (1979) The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 539-550.
Wetzel, T. (2004) What is gentrification? Retrieved on April 27, 2008 from http:// www.uncanny.net/~wetzel/gentry.html
White, J. & G. Wehlage (1995) Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is so hard to do it? Educational evaluation and policy Analysis, 17: 23-38.
Wyly, E. (2004) Gentrification, segregation, and discrimination in the American urban system. Environment and Planning, 36: 1215 – 1241.
Yasmi, Y., Schanz, H., & A. Salim (2006) Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 9: 538-546. Proyectos Similares:
Street Arts Center http://www.18thstreet.org
KnowledgePlex. Live/Working spaces
http://www.knowledgeplex.org/showdoc.html?id=1695811
http://www.knowledgeplex.org/showdoc.html?id=1695811 http://www.
knowledgeplex.org/showdoc.html?id=1695791
Leveraging Investments for Creativity http://www.lincnet.net/node
Descargas
Publicado
-
Resumen118
-
PDF50
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Portal de Ciencia Abierta