Municipal environment and conservation standards in Colombia: ¿protected areas, ecological networks or green infrastructures?

Authors

  • Fernando Remolina-Angarita

Keywords:

Protected areas, ecological networks, green infrastructures

Abstract

General conservation-related land use standards comprise environmentally important areas according to the principles of preservation, restoration and sustainable usage, which internationally consist of three categories, all conceptually different from each other depending on their particular components: i) protected areas, ii) ecological networks, and iii) green infrastructures. The articleanalyzes those general conservation standards in 32 Colombian municipalities in order to determine to which they respond for the most part, methodologically, by studying all local Territorial Planning Documents to establish which conservation standards were used, how they named, defined and classified them, and which components were considered, taking the name of the standard implemented in each town literally from the Plans studied. Then, each conservation standard found was classified as a protected area, an ecological network or a green infrastructure, based on the components accounted for and their classification. As a result, fifty general conservation standards were found under twenty-eight different denominations, mostly correspondent to ecological networks, followed by green infrastructures and, in a smaller amount, a combination of those two. It was also observed that, although structured by a great variety of environmental elements, as a common feature, all standards included water system components.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benedict, M. & McMahon, E. (2006). Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Washington: Island Press.

Decreto 3600 de 2007. Diario oficial No. 46.757 de 20 de septiembre de 2007.

Hepcan, S.; Hepcan, C.; Bouwma, I.; Jongman, R. & Ozkan, M. (2009). Ecological networks as a new approach for nature conservation in Turkey: a case study of Izmir Province. Landscape and Urban Planning, N° 90: 143-154.

Ignatieva M.; Stewart G. & Meurk C. (2011). Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landscape Ecological Engineering N° 7: 17-25.

Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales de Colombia (2011). Metodología de la primera aproximación de estructura ecológica principal a escala nacional (escala 1:500.000). Bogotá: IDEAM.

Jongman, R. (2004). Context and concept of ecological networks. En Jogman R., & Pungetti, G. (Eds.), Ecological Networks and Greenways: concept, design, implementation (pp 7-33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jongman, R.; Bouwma, I.; Griffioen, A.; Jones, L. & Van Doorn, A. (2011). The Pan European Ecological Network: PEEN. Landscape Ecology N° 26: 311-326.

Ley 165 de 1994. Diario Oficial No. 41.589, de 9 de noviembre de 1994.

Ley 388 de 1997. Diario Oficial No. 43.091, de 24 de Julio de 1997.

Lier van, H. (2005, noviembre). Ecological networks as a concept; recent developments in the Netherlands. Ponencia en las Primeras Jornadas Argentinas de Ecología del Paisaje en Buenos Aires.

Remolina, F. (2010). Propuesta de Estructura Ecológica Regional de la Región Capital y guía técnica para su declaración y consolidación. Informe final. Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.

Rooij, S.; van der Sluis, E. & Steingrover, E. (2003). Networks for life: development for an ecological network for Persiceto (Emilia-Rogmana, Italy). Alterra-rapport 729. Wageningen, Alterra, Green World Research.

Tubridy, M. & Riain, G. (2002). Preliminary study of the needs associated with a national ecological network (2000-LS-4-4) Synthesis report. Wexford, Ireland: Environmental Protection Agency.

UAESPNN – Unidad Administrativa Especial del Sistema de Parques Nacionales Naturales. (2007). El Sistema Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas – SINAP -. Propuesta técnica del Comité de Facilitación. Versión 1 de julio de 2007. Bogotá, D.C.

Valbuena, S.; Tavera, H. & Palacios, M. (2008). Propuesta de estructura ecológica regional para la región Central. Gobernación de Cundinamarca, Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá, Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca–CAR, Centro de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo Regional-UNCRD del Departamento de Asuntos Económicos y Sociales de la Secretaría de las Naciones UnidasUNDESA, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Bogotá D.C.

Van der Hammen, T. (1998). Estudio de la cuenca alta del río Bogotá. Bogotá: Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca.

Van der Hammen, T. & Andrade, G. (2003). Estructura Ecológica Principal de Colombia. Primera aproximación (Documento técnico). Bogotá: Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales de Colombia.

Published

2011-12-14
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    115
  • PDF (Español (España))
    46

How to Cite

Remolina-Angarita, F. . (2011). Municipal environment and conservation standards in Colombia: ¿protected areas, ecological networks or green infrastructures?. REVISTA NODO, 6(11), 65–76. Retrieved from https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/nodo/article/view/60

Issue

Section

Artículos

Metrics