Domains, Prejudices, and Diversity in Discrimination: Validation of Measurement Scales
Ámbitos, prejuicios y diversidad en la discriminación: validación de escalas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54104/papeles.v17n34.2170Keywords:
Disadvantage groups, discrimination, prejudice, stereotypes, psychometricsAbstract
Introduction: Discrimination, prejudice, and stereotypes toward vulnerable groups directly affect social equity and human rights by perpetuating inequalities and limiting opportunities. The validation of measurement instruments ensures that theoretical constructs related to discrimination are assessed in a precise, reliable, and culturally relevant manner. Therefore, the objective of this study was to validate the factorial structure of scales derived from the National Survey on Discrimination (Enadis 2019), focused on measuring áreas of discrimination, agreement with prejudice, openness to diversity, and permissiveness toward discrimination. Methodology: The study followed a quantitative approach, with a non-experimental, ex post facto, and cross-sectional design. A total of 389 university students from various academic fields at a public university in northwestern Mexico participated. The instruments used were the Enadis (2019) scales on discrimination, tolerance, permissiveness, and empathy. Results and Discussion: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted, showing adequate indices of validity and reliability in most scales. The Tolerance scale showed the highest explained variance (72.7 %) and the most robust structure; the Permissiveness scale was refined to six items with good model fit; and the Empathy scale was divided into two differentiated factors, contributing to the design of evidence-based public policies. Conclusions: The findings support the of these scales as diagnostic tools in educational and social contexts. It is recommended to expand their application to diverse populations.
Downloads
References
Alcaín Martínez, E. y Medina-García, M. (2017). Towards an inclusive university education: Reality and challenges. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 11(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.11.530
American Educational Research Association. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2024) Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM: Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas con participantes humanos. https://www.wma.net/es/policiespost/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicasen-seres-humanos/
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
Berlanga Silvente, V. y Rubio Hurtado, M.ª J. (2012). Clasificación de pruebas no paramétricas: Cómo aplicarlas en SPSS. Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 5(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2012.5.2528
Bollen, K. A. y Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002004
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford.
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807644
Cea D’Ancona, M. Á. y Vallés Martínez, M. S (2018). Actitudes hacia la inmigración en España. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminación. (2011). Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación en México Enadis 2010. https://www.conapred.org.mx/documentos_cedoc/Enadis-2010-RGAccss-002.pdf
Consejo Nacional para Prevenir la Discriminación. (2018). Encuesta nacional sobre discriminación 2017. https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enadis/2017/
Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J. y Cox, W. T. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1267-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2023). Informe sobre los derechos fundamentales, 2023. https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2023-fundamental-rightsreport-2023-opinions_es_2.pdf
Fueyo Gutiérrez, M. A. (2017). ¿Ya somos iguales? Visibilización de las desigualdades de género en la educación mediática de las estudiantes universitarias. En M. J. Iglesias Martínez e I. Lozano Cabezas (coords.), La (in)visibilidad de las mujeres en la educación superior: Retos y desafíos en la academia. Feminismo/s (pp. 99-124). Universidad de Alicante. https://doi.org/10.14198/fem.2017.29.04
García-Villanueva, J., Hernández Ramírez, C. I. y Ávila Rodríguez, D. (2021). Prejuicios de género hacia estudiantado universitario homosexual de una universidad pública en Ciudad de México. Praxis Educativa, 25(2), 116-143. https://dx.doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2021-2502
Greenwald, A. G. y Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L. y Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 97(1), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. y Anderson, R. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8.ª ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. y Baptista Lucio, M.ª del P. (2016). Metodología de la investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Iglesias Martínez, J. y Ares Mateos, A. (coords.) (2022). Caminos de convivencia: Claves para una adecuada integración social y convivencia intercultural en contextos locales. Ministerio de Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones. https://www.inclusion.gob.es/documents/6602794/6869025/GUIA_CAMINOS_DE_CONVIVENCIA.pdf/5bd48b51-3ee0-21b1-730f-6e1ed490beb1?t=1752150337157
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. (2023). Encuesta Nacional sobre Discriminación (Enadis) 2022. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2023/Enadis/Enadis_Nal22.pdf
Downloads
Published
-
Abstract0
-
PDF (Español)0
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ángel Emigdio Lagarda Lagarda, Claudia Karina Rodríguez Carvajal, José Ángel Vera Noriega, Karen Guadalupe Duarte Tánori

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.